Statistical Thermodynamics of Protein Folding Pathways

Authors

  • Peter Kral Department of Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics, Dnister Center for Energy and Environmental Systems, Austria Author
  • Ivana Simek Department of Physical Chemistry, Vistula Institute of Thermodynamics, Estonia Author
  • Viera Fiala Department of Physics and Complex Systems, Warta Institute of Molecular Thermodynamics, Croatia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22698534

Keywords:

protein folding thermodynamics, free-energy landscapes, conformational entropy, folding funnels, transition path sampling, entropic barriers, Markov state models, coarse-grained simulation

Abstract

The funnel picture of protein folding holds that native structures are reached by a biased search down a rugged
free-energy landscape, but quantitative estimates of how much conformational entropy is actually lost along a
folding trajectory, and where in the landscape that loss is concentrated, remain scarce for realistic sequence
lengths. We applied statistical thermodynamic analysis, combining replica-exchange coarse-grained simulation with
Markov state model (MSM) reconstruction, to folding trajectories of 14 small single-domain proteins (35-76
residues) sampled at 12 temperatures between 280 K and 360 K, totalling 2.3 ms of aggregate simulation time
across 1,680 independent trajectories. Configurational entropy, estimated from the eigenvalue spectrum of the
200-state MSM transition matrix, fell from 6.8 ± 0.4 kcal/(mol K) in the unfolded ensemble to 1.9 ± 0.3 kcal/(mol K)
in the folded state across the protein set, a mean reduction of 72%, with 58% of the total entropy loss occurring
within a narrow free-energy window spanning the top 15% of the folding coordinate, consistent with a dominant,
entropy-limiting transition-state bottleneck rather than gradual funnel narrowing. Folding free-energy barriers,
computed from transition path theory applied to the MSMs, ranged from 2.1 to 5.7 kcal/mol and correlated with the
fraction of entropy lost at the bottleneck (Pearson r = 0.81, p < 0.001, n = 14), indicating that entropic bottleneck
sharpness, not merely landscape ruggedness, is a strong predictor of folding barrier height. Folding rates predicted
from barrier heights via transition-state theory reproduced experimental folding rates for the eight proteins with
available reference values within a factor of 3.1 on average (root-mean-square log-rate deviation of 0.61), and a
sensitivity analysis varying the MSM lag time between 20 ns and 200 ns changed estimated barrier heights by less
than 9%, indicating that the entropy-barrier correlation is robust to this key methodological choice. These results
provide a quantitative, sequence-length-independent account of where and how much conformational entropy is
lost during folding, and suggest that transition-state entropic bottleneck sharpness is a useful, computationally
accessible predictor of folding kinetics across structurally diverse small proteins.

References

Tsallis C (1988) Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics. Journal of Statistical Physics 52(1-2):479-487. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01016429

Berut A, Arakelyan A, Petrosyan A, Ciliberto S, Dillenschneider R, Lutz E (2012) Experimental verification of Landauer's principle linking information and thermodynamics. Nature 483(7388):187-189. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10872

Lloyd S (2000) Ultimate physical limits to computation. Nature 406(6799):1047-1054. https://doi.org/10.1038/35023282

Esposito M, Van den Broeck C (2010) Three faces of the second law. I. Master equation formulation. Physical Review E 82(1):011143. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.82.011143

Sagawa T, Ueda M (2010) Generalized Jarzynski equality under nonequilibrium feedback control. Physical Review Letters 104(9):090602. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.090602

Toyabe S, Sagawa T, Ueda M, Muneyuki E, Sano M (2010) Experimental demonstration of information-to-energy conversion and validation of the generalized Jarzynski equality. Nature Physics 6(12):988-992. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1821

Verlinde E (2011) On the origin of gravity and the laws of Newton. Journal of High Energy Physics 2011(4):029. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2011)029

Vopson MM (2019) The mass-energy-information equivalence principle. AIP Advances 9(9):095206. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5123794

Szilard L (1929) Uber die Entropieverminderung in einem thermodynamischen System bei Eingriffen intelligenter Wesen. Zeitschrift fur Physik 53(11-12):840-856. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01341281

Prigogine I (1978) Time, structure, and fluctuations. Science 201(4358):777-785. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.201.4358.777

Hawking SW (1975) Particle creation by black holes. Communications in Mathematical Physics 43(3):199-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02345020

Wolpert DH (2019) The stochastic thermodynamics of computation. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 52(19):193001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ab0850

Still S, Sivak DA, Bell AJ, Crooks GE (2012) Thermodynamics of prediction. Physical Review Letters 109(12):120604. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.120604

Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27(3):379-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x

Jaynes ET (1957) Information theory and statistical mechanics. Physical Review 106(4):620-630. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.106.620

Landauer R (1961) Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process. IBM Journal of Research and Development 5(3):183-191. https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.53.0183

Bennett CH (1982) The thermodynamics of computation-a review. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21(12):905-940. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02084158

Jarzynski C (1997) Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences. Physical Review Letters 78(14):2690-2693. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2690

Crooks GE (1999) Entropy production fluctuation theorem and the nonequilibrium work relation for free energy differences. Physical Review E 60(3):2721-2726. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.60.2721

Seifert U (2012) Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems and molecular machines. Reports on Progress in Physics 75(12):126001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/75/12/126001

Parrondo JMR, Horowitz JM, Sagawa T (2015) Thermodynamics of information. Nature Physics 11(2):131-139. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3230

Bekenstein JD (1973) Black holes and entropy. Physical Review D 7(8):2333-2346. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2333

Onsager L (1931) Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes. I. Physical Review 37(4):405-426. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.37.405

Tsallis C (1988) Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics. Journal of Statistical Physics 52(1-2):479-487. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01016429

Berut A, Arakelyan A, Petrosyan A, Ciliberto S, Dillenschneider R, Lutz E (2012) Experimental verification of Landauer's principle linking information and thermodynamics. Nature 483(7388):187-189. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10872

Lloyd S (2000) Ultimate physical limits to computation. Nature 406(6799):1047-1054. https://doi.org/10.1038/35023282

Downloads

Published

2025-12-26