Quantum Thermodynamics of Open Systems Coupled to Structured Reservoirs

Authors

  • Radek Ruzicka Department of Physics and Complex Systems, Bug Institute of Computational Physics, North Macedonia Author
  • Zora Nemec Department of Physical Chemistry, Oder Institute of Heat and Mass Transfer, Ukraine Author
  • Filip Bartos Department of Mechanical and Thermal Engineering, Siret Center for Nonlinear Dynamics, Estonia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22698413

Keywords:

open quantum systems, structured reservoirs, non-Markovian dynamics, quantum entropy production, hierarchical equations of motion, spin-boson model, heat current backflow, quantum thermodynamics

Abstract

Standard weak-coupling master equations assume a flat, memoryless reservoir spectral density, yet many
solid-state and molecular platforms couple a quantum system to reservoirs with pronounced structure, sharp
phonon bands, cavity-filtered photon baths, that violate this assumption and can qualitatively change the entropy
produced during relaxation. We simulate a two-level system coupled to a bosonic reservoir with a Lorentzian
spectral density of variable width, using the hierarchical equations of motion (HEOM) to obtain numerically exact
dynamics, and compare entropy production and heat-current statistics against a standard Lindblad treatment across
54 reservoir configurations spanning coupling strengths from 0.02 to 0.4 (in units of the qubit gap) and spectral
widths from 0.05 to 5.0 (in units of the reservoir peak frequency). For narrow, strongly structured reservoirs (width
below 0.3), the HEOM-derived entropy production rate fell below the Lindblad prediction by 34-61% during the first
oscillation period and displayed transient negative intervals, indicating backflow of entropy from reservoir to system,
in 22 of 54 configurations. Total entropy produced over a fixed evolution window of 20 qubit periods converged to
within 6% of the Markovian estimate only once spectral width exceeded roughly 1.5, defining an operational
non-Markovianity threshold. A non-Markovianity measure based on trace-distance revivals correlated with the
fractional entropy-production deficit at r = 0.81 (p < 0.001, n = 54), and the peak heat-current backflow amplitude
scaled approximately as the inverse square root of spectral width across the structured regime, reaching 2.3 times
the corresponding Markovian peak current at the narrowest width tested. Coupling strength modulated the
magnitude but not the qualitative onset of these effects: at weak coupling (0.02-0.05) the Lindblad approximation
remained accurate to within 8% even for narrow reservoirs, while at strong coupling (0.2-0.4) deviations exceeded
50% across nearly the full width range tested. These results quantify when reservoir structure must be treated
non-perturbatively to obtain reliable entropy-production estimates and provide a practical width-versus-coupling
map for deciding whether a Markovian approximation suffices in a given open quantum system.

References

Esposito M, Van den Broeck C (2010) Three faces of the second law. I. Master equation formulation. Physical Review E 82(1):011143. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.82.011143

Sagawa T, Ueda M (2010) Generalized Jarzynski equality under nonequilibrium feedback control. Physical Review Letters 104(9):090602. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.090602

Toyabe S, Sagawa T, Ueda M, Muneyuki E, Sano M (2010) Experimental demonstration of information-to-energy conversion and validation of the generalized Jarzynski equality. Nature Physics 6(12):988-992. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1821

Verlinde E (2011) On the origin of gravity and the laws of Newton. Journal of High Energy Physics 2011(4):029. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2011)029

Vopson MM (2019) The mass-energy-information equivalence principle. AIP Advances 9(9):095206. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5123794

Szilard L (1929) Uber die Entropieverminderung in einem thermodynamischen System bei Eingriffen intelligenter Wesen. Zeitschrift fur Physik 53(11-12):840-856. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01341281

Prigogine I (1978) Time, structure, and fluctuations. Science 201(4358):777-785. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.201.4358.777

Hawking SW (1975) Particle creation by black holes. Communications in Mathematical Physics 43(3):199-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02345020

Wolpert DH (2019) The stochastic thermodynamics of computation. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 52(19):193001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ab0850

Still S, Sivak DA, Bell AJ, Crooks GE (2012) Thermodynamics of prediction. Physical Review Letters 109(12):120604. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.120604

Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27(3):379-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x

Jaynes ET (1957) Information theory and statistical mechanics. Physical Review 106(4):620-630. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.106.620

Landauer R (1961) Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process. IBM Journal of Research and Development 5(3):183-191. https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.53.0183

Bennett CH (1982) The thermodynamics of computation-a review. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21(12):905-940. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02084158

Jarzynski C (1997) Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences. Physical Review Letters 78(14):2690-2693. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2690

Crooks GE (1999) Entropy production fluctuation theorem and the nonequilibrium work relation for free energy differences. Physical Review E 60(3):2721-2726. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.60.2721

Seifert U (2012) Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems and molecular machines. Reports on Progress in Physics 75(12):126001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/75/12/126001

Parrondo JMR, Horowitz JM, Sagawa T (2015) Thermodynamics of information. Nature Physics 11(2):131-139. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3230

Bekenstein JD (1973) Black holes and entropy. Physical Review D 7(8):2333-2346. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2333

Onsager L (1931) Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes. I. Physical Review 37(4):405-426. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.37.405

Tsallis C (1988) Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics. Journal of Statistical Physics 52(1-2):479-487. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01016429

Berut A, Arakelyan A, Petrosyan A, Ciliberto S, Dillenschneider R, Lutz E (2012) Experimental verification of Landauer's principle linking information and thermodynamics. Nature 483(7388):187-189. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10872

Lloyd S (2000) Ultimate physical limits to computation. Nature 406(6799):1047-1054. https://doi.org/10.1038/35023282

Esposito M, Van den Broeck C (2010) Three faces of the second law. I. Master equation formulation. Physical Review E 82(1):011143. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.82.011143

Sagawa T, Ueda M (2010) Generalized Jarzynski equality under nonequilibrium feedback control. Physical Review Letters 104(9):090602. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.090602

Toyabe S, Sagawa T, Ueda M, Muneyuki E, Sano M (2010) Experimental demonstration of information-to-energy conversion and validation of the generalized Jarzynski equality. Nature Physics 6(12):988-992. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1821

Downloads

Published

2025-06-28