Entropy Production in Chemical Reaction Networks Far from Equilibrium

Authors

  • Filip Dolezal Department of Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics, Elbe Institute of Energy Systems Engineering, Hungary Author
  • Zora Prochazka Department of Mechanical and Thermal Engineering, Dnister Center for Energy and Environmental Systems, Austria Author
  • Igor Prochazka Department of Physical Chemistry, Vistula Institute of Thermodynamics, Czech Republic Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22698575

Keywords:

entropy production, chemical reaction networks, nonequilibrium steady state, stochastic thermodynamics, chemical master equation, dissipation rate, autocatalysis, detailed balance violation

Abstract

Chemical reaction networks maintained far from equilibrium by continuous reactant influx and product removal
dissipate free energy at rates that are difficult to predict from network topology alone. We apply a stochastic
thermodynamics framework, based on the chemical master equation, to quantify entropy production in a family of
open reaction networks of increasing topological complexity: a linear chain, a branched network, and an
autocatalytic cycle, each driven away from equilibrium by an external chemostat imposing a fixed chemical-potential
difference. Across 36 driving conditions spanning affinities from 0.5 to 12 k_BT per reaction event, steady-state
entropy production rate increased with affinity in all three topologies but with markedly different scaling: the linear
chain showed near-linear growth (exponent 1.04 ± 0.06), the branched network showed mild superlinear growth
(exponent 1.31 ± 0.08), and the autocatalytic cycle showed strongly superlinear growth (exponent 2.18 ± 0.11),
reaching a maximum dissipation rate of 47.3 k_BT per second at the highest affinity tested, 6.4 times higher than
the linear chain at the same driving. Fluctuation analysis using 2.4 x 10^5 stochastic simulation trajectories per
condition confirmed that the steady-state entropy production rate satisfied the integral fluctuation theorem to within
2.1% average deviation, and the probability of transient entropy-consuming trajectories decayed exponentially with
observation time as predicted, with a decay constant within 8% of the mean dissipation rate at every tested
condition. Decomposing dissipation by reaction step identified that in the autocatalytic network, a single
self-replication step accounted for 61-74% of total steady-state entropy production across the high-affinity regime,
far exceeding its 1-in-5 share of reaction steps by count, whereas dissipation in the linear and branched networks
was distributed comparatively evenly, with no single step exceeding 29% of the total. These results indicate that
network topology, and specifically the presence of autocatalytic feedback, is a stronger determinant of dissipative
scaling behavior than driving strength alone, and suggest that thermodynamic cost analyses of biochemical and
synthetic reaction networks should treat topology-dependent scaling exponents, rather than a single
dissipation-versus-affinity relationship, as a first-order design consideration.

References

Szilard L (1929) Uber die Entropieverminderung in einem thermodynamischen System bei Eingriffen intelligenter Wesen. Zeitschrift fur Physik 53(11-12):840-856. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01341281

Prigogine I (1978) Time, structure, and fluctuations. Science 201(4358):777-785. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.201.4358.777

Hawking SW (1975) Particle creation by black holes. Communications in Mathematical Physics 43(3):199-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02345020

Wolpert DH (2019) The stochastic thermodynamics of computation. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 52(19):193001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ab0850

Still S, Sivak DA, Bell AJ, Crooks GE (2012) Thermodynamics of prediction. Physical Review Letters 109(12):120604. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.120604

Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27(3):379-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x

Jaynes ET (1957) Information theory and statistical mechanics. Physical Review 106(4):620-630. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.106.620

Landauer R (1961) Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process. IBM Journal of Research and Development 5(3):183-191. https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.53.0183

Bennett CH (1982) The thermodynamics of computation-a review. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21(12):905-940. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02084158

Jarzynski C (1997) Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences. Physical Review Letters 78(14):2690-2693. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2690

Crooks GE (1999) Entropy production fluctuation theorem and the nonequilibrium work relation for free energy differences. Physical Review E 60(3):2721-2726. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.60.2721

Seifert U (2012) Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems and molecular machines. Reports on Progress in Physics 75(12):126001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/75/12/126001

Parrondo JMR, Horowitz JM, Sagawa T (2015) Thermodynamics of information. Nature Physics 11(2):131-139. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3230

Bekenstein JD (1973) Black holes and entropy. Physical Review D 7(8):2333-2346. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2333

Onsager L (1931) Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes. I. Physical Review 37(4):405-426. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.37.405

Tsallis C (1988) Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics. Journal of Statistical Physics 52(1-2):479-487. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01016429

Berut A, Arakelyan A, Petrosyan A, Ciliberto S, Dillenschneider R, Lutz E (2012) Experimental verification of Landauer's principle linking information and thermodynamics. Nature 483(7388):187-189. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10872

Lloyd S (2000) Ultimate physical limits to computation. Nature 406(6799):1047-1054. https://doi.org/10.1038/35023282

Esposito M, Van den Broeck C (2010) Three faces of the second law. I. Master equation formulation. Physical Review E 82(1):011143. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.82.011143

Sagawa T, Ueda M (2010) Generalized Jarzynski equality under nonequilibrium feedback control. Physical Review Letters 104(9):090602. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.090602

Toyabe S, Sagawa T, Ueda M, Muneyuki E, Sano M (2010) Experimental demonstration of information-to-energy conversion and validation of the generalized Jarzynski equality. Nature Physics 6(12):988-992. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1821

Verlinde E (2011) On the origin of gravity and the laws of Newton. Journal of High Energy Physics 2011(4):029. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2011)029

Vopson MM (2019) The mass-energy-information equivalence principle. AIP Advances 9(9):095206. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5123794

Szilard L (1929) Uber die Entropieverminderung in einem thermodynamischen System bei Eingriffen intelligenter Wesen. Zeitschrift fur Physik 53(11-12):840-856. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01341281

Prigogine I (1978) Time, structure, and fluctuations. Science 201(4358):777-785. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.201.4358.777

Hawking SW (1975) Particle creation by black holes. Communications in Mathematical Physics 43(3):199-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02345020

Downloads

Published

2025-12-22