Climate Finance Mechanisms for Renewable Energy Deployment in Developing Economies

Authors

  • Sanne Peeters Institute for Climate Modeling and Data Analysis, Loire University Center for Climate Data Analysis, France Author
  • Laura Bianchi Department of Environmental Science and Sustainability, Tyrrhenian University of Climate and Sustainability, Italy Author
  • Alessandro Halvorsen Department of Climate Science, Aegean Institute of Atmospheric Research, Greece Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22819828

Keywords:

climate finance, renewable energy investment, developing economies, Green Climate Fund, blended finance, de-risking instruments, cost of capital, sovereign risk premium

Abstract

Renewable energy investment in developing economies is constrained less by resource potential or technology cost
than by the cost of capital investors demand for perceived country risk. We assembled a project-level panel of 612
utility-scale solar and onshore wind projects financed across 42 developing economies between 2015 and 2024,
combining project finance term sheets, Green Climate Fund funding proposals, and development bank co-financing
records, to quantify how concessional finance and blended de-risking instruments, partial risk guarantees, first-loss
tranches, and subordinated concessional debt, affect the weighted average cost of capital and the private capital
mobilized per public dollar committed. Nominal project-level cost of capital averaged 11.6% across Sub-Saharan
African projects and 9.1% across South and Southeast Asian projects, against 4.3% in a matched OECD sample, a
gap strongly associated with sovereign credit spreads: ten-year EMBI spread explained 54% of cross-country
variance in a fixed-effects panel regression. Blended structures incorporating a partial risk guarantee or first-loss
tranche reduced cost of capital by a mean of 280 basis points relative to comparable commercially financed
projects, and Green Climate Fund-anchored vehicles mobilized private capital at a mean ratio of 4.3 US dollars per
public dollar committed, though this ratio fell below 2.0 in fragile states and markets lacking developed currency
debt. Mobilization ratios were highest where concessional finance was paired with local-currency hedging facilities
rather than deployed as a standalone subsidy. These findings indicate that de-risking instruments materially lower
financing costs and mobilize private capital at scale, but their effectiveness is conditional on complementary
currency-risk and institutional-capacity measures rather than concessionality alone, with implications for how the
Green Climate Fund should prioritize instrument design.

References

Schmidt TS (2014) Low-carbon investment risks and de-risking. Nature Climate Change 4(4):237-239. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2112

Ameli N, Dessens O, Winning M, Cronin J, Chenet H, Drummond P, Calzadilla A, Anandarajah G, Grubb M (2021) Higher cost of finance exacerbates a climate investment trap in developing economies. Nature Communications 12:4046. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24305-3

Egli F, Steffen B, Schmidt TS (2018) A dynamic analysis of financing conditions for renewable energy technologies. Nature Energy 3(12):1084-1092. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0277-y

Polzin F, Sanders M (2020) How to finance the transition to low-carbon energy in Europe? Energy Policy 147:111863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111863

Carter P, Van de Sijpe N, Calel R (2021) The elusive quest for additionality. World Development 141:105393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105393

Ondraczek J, Komendantova N, Patt A (2015) WACC the dog: The effect of financing costs on the levelized cost of solar PV power. Renewable Energy 75:888-898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.053

Steffen B (2020) Estimating the cost of capital for renewable energy projects. Energy Economics 88:104783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104783

Donovan C, Nuñez L (2012) Figuring what is fair: The cost of equity capital for renewable energy in emerging markets. Energy Policy 40:49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.060

Geddes A, Schmidt TS, Steffen B (2018) The multiple roles of state investment banks in low-carbon energy finance: An analysis of Australia, the UK and Germany. Energy Policy 115:158-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.009

Colenbrander S, Dodman D, Mitlin D (2018) Using climate finance to advance climate justice: the politics and practice of channelling resources to the local level. Climate Policy 18(7):902-915. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1388212

Mazzucato M, Semieniuk G (2018) Financing renewable energy: Who is financing what and why it matters. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 127:8-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.021

Hirth L, Steckel JC (2016) The role of capital costs in decarbonizing the electricity sector. Environmental Research Letters 11(11):114010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/11/114010

Best R (2017) Switching towards coal or renewable energy? The effects of financial capital on energy transitions. Energy Economics 63:75-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.01.019

Pauw WP, Klein RJT, Vellinga P, Biermann F (2016) Private finance for adaptation: do private realities meet public ambitions? Climatic Change 134(4):489-503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1539-3

Dikau S, Volz U (2021) Central bank mandates, sustainability objectives and the promotion of green finance. Ecological Economics 184:107022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107022

Semieniuk G, Campiglio E, Mercure JF, Volz U, Edwards NR (2021) Low-carbon transition risks for finance. WIREs Climate Change 12(1):e678. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.678

Cárdenas Rodríguez M, Hascic I, Souchier M (2015) Renewable energy policies and private sector investment: evidence from financial microdata. Environmental and Resource Economics 62(1):163-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-014-9820-x

Steckel JC, Jakob M (2018) The role of financing cost and de-risking strategies for clean energy investment. International Economics 155:19-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2018.02.003

Polzin F, Egli F, Steffen B, Schmidt TS (2019) How do policies mobilize private finance for renewable energy? A systematic review with an investor perspective. Applied Energy 236:1249-1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.098

Weikmans R, Roberts JT (2019) The international climate finance accounting muddle: is there hope on the horizon? Climate and Development 11(2):97-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2017.1410087

Fankhauser S, Sahni A, Savvas A, Ward J (2016) Where are the gaps in climate finance? Climate and Development 8(3):203-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2015.1064811

Granoff I, Hogarth JR, Miller A (2016) Nested barriers to low-carbon infrastructure investment. Nature Climate Change 6(12):1065-1071. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3142

Eyraud L, Clements B, Wane A (2013) Green investment: trends and determinants. Energy Policy 60:852-865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.039

IPCC (2022) Investment and finance. In: Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Chapter 15. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926.017

Downloads

Published

2026-12-13