Chromatin Remodeling During Reprogramming of Somatic Cells to Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Authors

  • Tomasz Larsen Department of Molecular Biology, Danube University Center for Chromatin Biology, Slovakia Author
  • Claire Solberg Department of Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Aegean Institute of Molecular Biology, Greece Author
  • Nils Gallagher Department of Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Iberian University Center for Genome Regulation, Spain Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22756698

Keywords:

induced pluripotent stem cells, reprogramming, SWI/SNF, BAF complex, H3K9me3 barrier, chromatin accessibility, Yamanaka factors

Abstract

Reprogramming of somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) by the transcription factors OCT4, SOX2,
KLF4 and MYC (OSKM) requires large-scale chromatin remodeling to convert a differentiated, lineage-restricted
accessibility landscape into the open, pluripotency-associated configuration of embryonic stem cells, yet the relative
contribution of specific remodeling complexes to this transition remains incompletely defined. Here we combined a
doxycycline-inducible OSKM reprogramming system in mouse embryonic fibroblasts with time-resolved ATAC-seq,
ChIP-seq for H3K9me3 and H3K27me3, single-cell RNA-sequencing, and short hairpin RNA depletion of the BAF
complex ATPase SMARCA4 (BRG1) to dissect the chromatin remodeling trajectory of reprogramming and its
rate-limiting barriers. ATAC-seq across a 12-day reprogramming time course resolved three accessibility phases:
an early, transient wave of accessibility gain at somatic enhancers within 48 hours of OSKM induction, a mid-phase
accessibility loss at fibroblast identity genes coinciding with H3K9me3 accumulation, and a late-phase acquisition of
accessibility at pluripotency-associated loci restricted to cells that successfully completed reprogramming.
SMARCA4 depletion did not block the early somatic enhancer response but severely impaired late-phase opening
of pluripotency loci and reduced iPSC colony formation efficiency by 83%, without preventing H3K9me3
accumulation at silenced somatic genes, indicating that BAF-dependent remodeling acts specifically at the late,
pluripotency-establishing step. Single-cell RNA-sequencing identified a discrete subpopulation of cells at day 8 with
elevated Smarca4 and reduced H3K9me3-associated repressor expression that preferentially progressed to a
pluripotent state by day 12, while cells retaining high H3K9me3-pathway expression stalled in a partially
reprogrammed state. These results define a three-phase chromatin remodeling trajectory in which H3K9me3
deposition acts as a barrier independent of BAF complex activity, while BAF-dependent remodeling is specifically
required to open pluripotency loci once that barrier is cleared, reconciling BAF and heterochromatin-barrier models
within a single ordered framework.

References

Takahashi K, Yamanaka S (2006) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126(4):663-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024

Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, Yamanaka S (2007) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131(5):861-872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019

Koche RP, Smith ZD, Adli M, Gu H, Ku M, Gnirke A, Bernstein BE, Meissner A (2011) Reprogramming factor expression initiates widespread targeted chromatin remodeling. Cell Stem Cell 8(1):96-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2010.12.001

Knaupp AS, Buckberry S, Pflueger J, Lim SM, Ford E, Larcombe MR, Rossello FJ, de Mendoza A, Alaei S, Firas J, Holmes ML, Nair SS, Clark SJ, Nefzger CM, Lister R, Polo JM (2017) Transient and permanent reconfiguration of chromatin and transcription factor occupancy drive reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 21(6):834-845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2017.11.007

Chen J, Liu H, Liu J, Qi J, Wei B, Yang J, Liang H, Chen Y, Chen J, Wu Y, Guo L, Zhu J, Zhao X, Peng T, Zhang Y, Chen S, Li X, Li D, Wang T, Pei D (2013) H3K9 methylation is a barrier during somatic cell reprogramming into iPSCs. Nature Genetics 45(1):34-42. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2491

Sridharan R, Gonzales-Cope M, Chronis C, Bonora G, McKee R, Huang C, Patel S, Lopez D, Mishra N, Pellegrini M, Carey M, Garcia BA, Plath K (2013) Proteomic and genomic approaches reveal critical functions of H3K9 methylation and heterochromatin protein-1gamma in reprogramming to pluripotency. Nature Cell Biology 15(7):872-882. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2768

Singhal N, Graumann J, Wu G, Arauzo-Bravo MJ, Han DW, Greber B, Gentile L, Mann M, Scholer HR (2010) Chromatin-remodeling components of the BAF complex facilitate reprogramming. Cell 141(6):943-955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.037

Hu G, Kim J, Xu Q, Leng Y, Orkin SH, Elledge SJ (2009) A genome-wide RNAi screen identifies a new transcriptional module required for self-renewal. Genes & Development 23(7):837-848. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1769609

Buganim Y, Faddah DA, Cheng AW, Itskovich E, Markoulaki S, Ganz K, Klemm SL, van Oudenaarden A, Jaenisch R (2012) Single-cell expression analyses during cellular reprogramming reveal an early stochastic and a late hierarchic phase. Cell 150(6):1209-1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.023

Guo S, Zi X, Schulz VP, Cheng J, Zhong M, Koochaki SH, Megyola CM, Pan X, Heydari K, Weissman SM, Gallagher PG, Krause DS, Fan R, Lu J (2013) Nonstochastic reprogramming from a privileged somatic cell state. Cell 156(4):649-662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.020

Polo JM, Anderssen E, Walsh RM, Schwarz BA, Nefzger CM, Lim SM, Borkent M, Apostolou E, Alaei S, Cloutier J, Bar-Nur O, Cheloufi S, Stadtfeld M, Figueroa ME, Robinton D, Natesan S, Melnick A, Zhu J, Ramaswamy S, Hochedlinger K (2012) A molecular roadmap of reprogramming somatic cells into iPS cells. Cell 151(7):1617-1632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.039

Onder TT, Kara N, Cherry A, Sinha AU, Zhu N, Bernt KM, Cahan P, Marro S, Unternaehrer JJ, Loh YH, Aryee MJ, Lensch MW, Li H, Collins JJ, Armstrong SA, Daley GQ (2012) Chromatin-modifying enzymes as modulators of reprogramming. Nature 483(7391):598-602. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10953

Bernstein BE, Mikkelsen TS, Xie X, Kamal M, Huebert DJ, Cuff J, Fry B, Meissner A, Wernig M, Plath K, Jaenisch R, Wagschal A, Feil R, Schreiber SL, Lander ES (2006) A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125(2):315-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.041

Mikkelsen TS, Hanna J, Zhang X, Ku M, Wernig M, Schorderet P, Bernstein BE, Jaenisch R, Lander ES, Meissner A (2008) Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis. Nature 454(7200):49-55. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07056

Soufi A, Donahue G, Zaret KS (2012) Facilitators and impediments of the pluripotency reprogramming factors initial engagement with the genome. Cell 151(5):994-1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.045

Soufi A, Garcia MF, Jaroszewicz A, Osman N, Pellegrini M, Zaret KS (2015) Pioneer transcription factors target partial DNA motifs on nucleosomes to initiate reprogramming. Cell 161(3):555-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.017

Zhu F, Farnung L, Kaasinen E, Sahu B, Yin Y, Wei B, Dodonova SO, Nitta KR, Morgunova E, Taipale M, Cramer P, Taipale J (2018) The interaction landscape between transcription factors and the nucleosome. Nature 562(7725):76-81. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0549-5

King HW, Klose RJ (2017) The pioneer factor OCT4 requires the chromatin remodeller BRG1 to support gene regulatory element function in mouse embryonic stem cells. eLife 6:e22631. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22631

Kaji K, Caballero IM, MacLeod R, Nichols J, Wilson VA, Hendrich B (2006) The NuRD component Mbd3 is required for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nature Cell Biology 8(3):285-292. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1372

Rais Y, Zviran A, Geula S, Gafni O, Chomsky E, Viukov S, Mansour AA, Caspi I, Krupalnik V, Zerbib M, Maza I, Mor N, Baran D, Weinberger L, Jaitin DA, Lara-Astiaso D, Blecher-Gonen R, Shipony Z, Mukamel Z, Hagai T, Gilad S, Amann-Zalcenstein D, Tanay A, Amit I, Novershtern N, Hanna JH (2013) Deterministic direct reprogramming of somatic cells to pluripotency. Nature 502(7469):65-70. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12587

Hanna J, Saha K, Pando B, van Zon J, Lengner CJ, Creyghton MP, van Oudenaarden A, Jaenisch R (2009) Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration. Nature 462(7273):595-601. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08592

Cacchiarelli D, Trapnell C, Ziller MJ, Soumillon M, Cesana M, Karnik R, Donaghey J, Smith ZD, Ratanasirintrawoot S, Zhang X, Ho Sui SJ, Wu Z, Akopian V, Gifford CA, Doench J, Rinn JL, Daley GQ, Meissner A, Lander ES, Mikkelsen TS (2015) Integrative analyses of human reprogramming reveal dynamic nature of induced pluripotency. Cell 162(2):412-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.016

Papp B, Plath K (2013) Epigenetics of reprogramming to induced pluripotency. Cell 152(6):1324-1343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.043

Boyer LA, Plath K, Zeitlinger J, Brambrink T, Medeiros LA, Lee TI, Levine SS, Wernig M, Tajonar A, Ray MK, Bell GW, Otte AP, Vidal M, Gifford DK, Young RA, Jaenisch R (2006) Polycomb complexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature 441(7091):349-353. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04733

Ho L, Jothi R, Ronan JL, Cui K, Zhao K, Crabtree GR (2009) An embryonic stem cell chromatin remodeling complex, esBAF, is an essential component of the core pluripotency transcriptional network. PNAS 106(13):5187-5191. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812888106

Kidder BL, Palmer S (2012) HDAC1 regulates pluripotency and lineage specific transcriptional networks in embryonic and trophoblast stem cells. Nucleic Acids Research 40(7):2925-2939. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1151

Wang J, Zhuang J, Iyer S, Lin XY, Whitfield TW, Greven MC, Pierce BG, Dong X, Kundaje A, Cheng Y, Rando OJ, Birney E, Myers RM, Noble WS, Snyder M, Weng Z (2012) Sequence features and chromatin structure around the genomic regions bound by 119 human transcription factors. Genome Research 22(9):1798-1812. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.139105.112

Fu Y, Rocha PP, Luo VM, Raviram R, Deng Y, Mazzoni EO, Skok JA (2016) CTCF mediates crosstalk between distinct sites of the CD4 locus and protects promoters from long-range silencing. Nature Communications 7:12570. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12570

Efroni S, Duttagupta R, Cheng J, Dehghani H, Hoeppner DJ, Dash C, Bazett-Jones DP, Le Grice S, McKay RD, Buetow KH, Gingeras TR, Misteli T, Meshorer E (2008) Global transcription in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2(5):437-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2008.03.021

Apostolou E, Ferrari F, Walsh RM, Bar-Nur O, Stadtfeld M, Cheloufi S, Stuart HT, Polo JM, Ohsumi TK, Borowsky ML, Kharchenko PV, Park PJ, Hochedlinger K (2013) Genome-wide chromatin interactions of the Nanog locus in pluripotency, differentiation, and reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 12(6):699-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2013.04.013

Chronis C, Fiziev P, Papp B, Butz S, Bonora G, Sabri S, Ernst J, Plath K (2017) Cooperative binding of transcription factors orchestrates reprogramming. Cell 168(3):442-459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.016

Li D, Liu J, Yang X, Zhou C, Guo J, Wu C, Qin Y, Guo L, He J, Yu S, Liu H, Wang X, Wu F, Kuang J, Hutchins AP, Chen J, Pei D (2017) Chromatin accessibility dynamics during iPSC reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 21(6):819-833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2017.10.012

Toh CXD, Chan JW, Chong ZS, Wang HF, Guo HC, Satapathy S, Ma D, Goh GY, Khattar E, Yang L, Tergaonkar V, Colman A, Collins JJ, Daley GQ, Shu X, Wu G, Han J (2016) RNAi reveals phase-specific global regulators of human somatic cell reprogramming. Cell Reports 15(12):2597-2607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.049

Xu J, Du Y, Deng H (2015) Direct lineage reprogramming: strategies, mechanisms, and applications. Cell Stem Cell 16(2):119-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2015.01.013

Clapier CR, Cairns BR (2009) The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes. Annual Review of Biochemistry 78:273-304. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.06 2706.153223

Narlikar GJ, Sundaramoorthy R, Owen-Hughes T (2013) Mechanisms and functions of ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling enzymes. Cell 154(3):490-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.011

Kadoch C, Crabtree GR (2015) Mammalian SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes and cancer: mechanistic insights gained from human genomics. Science Advances 1(5):e1500447. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500447

Alexander JM, Hota SK, He D, Thomas S, Ho L, Pennacchio LA, Bruneau BG (2015) Brg1 modulates enhancer activation in mesoderm lineage commitment. Development 142(8):1418-1430. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.109496

Gaspar-Maia A, Alajem A, Meshorer E, Ramalho-Santos M (2011) Open chromatin in pluripotency and reprogramming. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 12(1):36-47. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3036

Wu JI, Lessard J, Crabtree GR (2009) Understanding the words of chromatin regulation. Cell 136(2):200-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.009

Downloads

Published

2026-06-12