Entropy Generation Analysis of Magnetohydrodynamic Flow Systems

Authors

  • Jana Bartos Department of Mechanical and Thermal Engineering, Douro Institute of Statistical Mechanics, Czech Republic Author
  • Michaela Farkas Department of Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics, Oder Institute of Heat and Mass Transfer, Lithuania Author
  • Boris Zizka Department of Physical Chemistry, Siret Center for Nonlinear Dynamics, Portugal Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22698449

Keywords:

entropy generation minimization, magnetohydrodynamic flow, Hartmann number, Joule dissipation, viscous irreversibility, second-law analysis, Bejan number, channel flow

Abstract

Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) channel flows are widely used in liquid-metal cooling loops, electromagnetic pumps,
and plasma-facing energy systems, where an imposed transverse magnetic field suppresses velocity fluctuations
but introduces an additional, often dominant, irreversibility channel through Joule dissipation. We report a
volume-averaged entropy generation analysis of steady, incompressible, electrically conducting fluid flow between
parallel plates subject to a transverse magnetic field, solving the coupled momentum and energy equations across
54 combinations of Hartmann number (0 to 40) and wall heat flux (500 to 4000 W/m^2) at a fixed Reynolds number
of 1200. Total dimensionless entropy generation number N_S rose from 0.86 at Ha = 0 to 3.42 at Ha = 40, a 298%
increase, while the Bejan number, the fraction of entropy generation attributable to heat transfer irreversibility, fell
from 0.71 to 0.19 over the same range, indicating a decisive shift toward magnetic-field-driven irreversibility at high
Hartmann number. Joule dissipation accounted for 61% of total entropy generation at Ha = 40 versus 0% at Ha = 0
by construction, and exceeded viscous dissipation as the second-largest contributor once Ha exceeded 14, a
threshold that was consistent within +/-1 Hartmann-number unit across all five wall heat flux levels tested. An
optimum Hartmann number of Ha = 9.4 minimized total entropy generation at the lowest heat flux tested (500
W/m^2), but this optimum vanished at wall heat fluxes above 2200 W/m^2, where N_S increased monotonically with
Ha across the full range, reflecting the growing dominance of Joule heating once conductive wall loading is high
enough that additional flow damping no longer meaningfully reduces thermal irreversibility. A regression of N_S
against Ha^2 and wall heat flux explained 97.3% of the variance in the simulated dataset (R^2 = 0.973,
root-mean-square error 0.081), confirming the expected quadratic scaling of Joule dissipation with magnetic field
strength. These results indicate that entropy generation minimization in MHD channel flow is not achieved by
uniformly maximizing or minimizing the applied magnetic field, but requires a heat-flux-dependent optimum
Hartmann number below which flow damping benefits outweigh Joule losses, a design criterion directly applicable
to liquid-metal blanket and MHD pump engineering.

References

Wolpert DH (2019) The stochastic thermodynamics of computation. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 52(19):193001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ab0850

Still S, Sivak DA, Bell AJ, Crooks GE (2012) Thermodynamics of prediction. Physical Review Letters 109(12):120604. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.120604

Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27(3):379-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x

Jaynes ET (1957) Information theory and statistical mechanics. Physical Review 106(4):620-630. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.106.620

Landauer R (1961) Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process. IBM Journal of Research and Development 5(3):183-191. https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.53.0183

Bennett CH (1982) The thermodynamics of computation-a review. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21(12):905-940. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02084158

Jarzynski C (1997) Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences. Physical Review Letters 78(14):2690-2693. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2690

Crooks GE (1999) Entropy production fluctuation theorem and the nonequilibrium work relation for free energy differences. Physical Review E 60(3):2721-2726. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.60.2721

Seifert U (2012) Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems and molecular machines. Reports on Progress in Physics 75(12):126001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/75/12/126001

Parrondo JMR, Horowitz JM, Sagawa T (2015) Thermodynamics of information. Nature Physics 11(2):131-139. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3230

Bekenstein JD (1973) Black holes and entropy. Physical Review D 7(8):2333-2346. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2333

Onsager L (1931) Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes. I. Physical Review 37(4):405-426. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.37.405

Tsallis C (1988) Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics. Journal of Statistical Physics 52(1-2):479-487. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01016429

Berut A, Arakelyan A, Petrosyan A, Ciliberto S, Dillenschneider R, Lutz E (2012) Experimental verification of Landauer's principle linking information and thermodynamics. Nature 483(7388):187-189. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10872

Lloyd S (2000) Ultimate physical limits to computation. Nature 406(6799):1047-1054. https://doi.org/10.1038/35023282

Esposito M, Van den Broeck C (2010) Three faces of the second law. I. Master equation formulation. Physical Review E 82(1):011143. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.82.011143

Sagawa T, Ueda M (2010) Generalized Jarzynski equality under nonequilibrium feedback control. Physical Review Letters 104(9):090602. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.090602

Toyabe S, Sagawa T, Ueda M, Muneyuki E, Sano M (2010) Experimental demonstration of information-to-energy conversion and validation of the generalized Jarzynski equality. Nature Physics 6(12):988-992. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1821

Verlinde E (2011) On the origin of gravity and the laws of Newton. Journal of High Energy Physics 2011(4):029. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2011)029

Vopson MM (2019) The mass-energy-information equivalence principle. AIP Advances 9(9):095206. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5123794

Szilard L (1929) Uber die Entropieverminderung in einem thermodynamischen System bei Eingriffen intelligenter Wesen. Zeitschrift fur Physik 53(11-12):840-856. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01341281

Prigogine I (1978) Time, structure, and fluctuations. Science 201(4358):777-785. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.201.4358.777

Hawking SW (1975) Particle creation by black holes. Communications in Mathematical Physics 43(3):199-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02345020

Wolpert DH (2019) The stochastic thermodynamics of computation. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 52(19):193001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ab0850

Still S, Sivak DA, Bell AJ, Crooks GE (2012) Thermodynamics of prediction. Physical Review Letters 109(12):120604. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.120604

Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27(3):379-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x

Downloads

Published

2026-06-17