Shannon Entropy Analysis of Financial Time Series Volatility

Authors

  • Ivana Ocenas Department of Physics and Complex Systems, Prut Institute of Physical Chemistry and Entropy Studies, Slovakia Author
  • Klara Dvorak Department of Physics and Complex Systems, Vltava Institute of Applied Physics, Latvia Author
  • Katarina Blazek Department of Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics, Tagus Center for Information Theory, Moldova Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22698512

Keywords:

Shannon entropy, financial time series, volatility clustering, permutation entropy, market efficiency, information theory, symbolic dynamics, regime detection

Abstract

Volatility clustering in financial markets, in which large price changes tend to follow large changes of either sign, is
well documented but not consistently linked to a single quantitative measure that anticipates regime shifts before
they appear in realized volatility itself. We computed rolling-window Shannon entropy and permutation entropy of
daily log-return series for 40 large-capitalization equities and 6 broad equity indices over a 22-year sample period
(2003-2024, approximately 5,540 trading days per series), using symbolic discretization into 8 amplitude bins and
embedding dimension 5 for the permutation-entropy estimator, computed over rolling 250-day windows. Mean
normalized Shannon entropy across all 46 series was 0.912 (SD = 0.041) during low-volatility regimes (bottom
tercile of realized volatility) and fell to 0.847 (SD = 0.058) during high-volatility regimes (top tercile), a reduction of
7.1% (Welch's t = 18.4, p < 0.001, n = 46 series), reflecting the more predictable, directionally persistent character
of returns during volatility clusters relative to the comparatively uniform distribution of returns in calm periods.
Entropy declines preceded peaks in realized volatility by a median of 6 trading days across the 46 series
(interquartile range 3-11 days), and a threshold-crossing early-warning rule based on a one-standard-deviation
entropy drop achieved 68% sensitivity and 74% specificity for anticipating volatility regime shifts identified
independently via a two-state Markov-switching model, evaluated by 10-fold cross-validation across
non-overlapping historical windows. Permutation entropy showed a weaker but still significant regime discrimination
(5.3% reduction, high- versus low-volatility regimes, p < 0.001) and correlated with Shannon entropy across series
at r = 0.79 (p < 0.001), indicating substantial but incomplete redundancy between the two measures. Entropy-based
regime discrimination was strongest for financial-sector and technology-sector equities (9.4% and 8.6% mean
entropy reduction, respectively) and weakest for consumer-staples equities (4.2%), a sector difference that
persisted after controlling for mean realized volatility level. These results indicate that rolling Shannon entropy
carries exploitable early-warning information about impending volatility regime shifts beyond what realized volatility
alone provides, with practical implications for risk-management systems that monitor entropy alongside
conventional volatility estimators.

References

Bekenstein JD (1973) Black holes and entropy. Physical Review D 7(8):2333-2346. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2333

Onsager L (1931) Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes. I. Physical Review 37(4):405-426. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.37.405

Tsallis C (1988) Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics. Journal of Statistical Physics 52(1-2):479-487. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01016429

Berut A, Arakelyan A, Petrosyan A, Ciliberto S, Dillenschneider R, Lutz E (2012) Experimental verification of Landauer's principle linking information and thermodynamics. Nature 483(7388):187-189. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10872

Lloyd S (2000) Ultimate physical limits to computation. Nature 406(6799):1047-1054. https://doi.org/10.1038/35023282

Esposito M, Van den Broeck C (2010) Three faces of the second law. I. Master equation formulation. Physical Review E 82(1):011143. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.82.011143

Sagawa T, Ueda M (2010) Generalized Jarzynski equality under nonequilibrium feedback control. Physical Review Letters 104(9):090602. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.090602

Toyabe S, Sagawa T, Ueda M, Muneyuki E, Sano M (2010) Experimental demonstration of information-to-energy conversion and validation of the generalized Jarzynski equality. Nature Physics 6(12):988-992. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1821

Verlinde E (2011) On the origin of gravity and the laws of Newton. Journal of High Energy Physics 2011(4):029. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2011)029

Vopson MM (2019) The mass-energy-information equivalence principle. AIP Advances 9(9):095206. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5123794

Szilard L (1929) Uber die Entropieverminderung in einem thermodynamischen System bei Eingriffen intelligenter Wesen. Zeitschrift fur Physik 53(11-12):840-856. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01341281

Prigogine I (1978) Time, structure, and fluctuations. Science 201(4358):777-785. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.201.4358.777

Hawking SW (1975) Particle creation by black holes. Communications in Mathematical Physics 43(3):199-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02345020

Wolpert DH (2019) The stochastic thermodynamics of computation. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 52(19):193001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ab0850

Still S, Sivak DA, Bell AJ, Crooks GE (2012) Thermodynamics of prediction. Physical Review Letters 109(12):120604. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.120604

Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27(3):379-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x

Jaynes ET (1957) Information theory and statistical mechanics. Physical Review 106(4):620-630. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.106.620

Landauer R (1961) Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process. IBM Journal of Research and Development 5(3):183-191. https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.53.0183

Bennett CH (1982) The thermodynamics of computation-a review. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21(12):905-940. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02084158

Jarzynski C (1997) Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences. Physical Review Letters 78(14):2690-2693. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2690

Crooks GE (1999) Entropy production fluctuation theorem and the nonequilibrium work relation for free energy differences. Physical Review E 60(3):2721-2726. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.60.2721

Seifert U (2012) Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems and molecular machines. Reports on Progress in Physics 75(12):126001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/75/12/126001

Parrondo JMR, Horowitz JM, Sagawa T (2015) Thermodynamics of information. Nature Physics 11(2):131-139. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3230

Bekenstein JD (1973) Black holes and entropy. Physical Review D 7(8):2333-2346. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2333

Onsager L (1931) Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes. I. Physical Review 37(4):405-426. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.37.405

Tsallis C (1988) Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics. Journal of Statistical Physics 52(1-2):479-487. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01016429

Downloads

Published

2023-12-10