Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics of Active Matter Systems

Authors

  • Marek Mach Department of Mechanical and Thermal Engineering, Dnister Center for Energy and Environmental Systems, Bulgaria Author
  • Viera Havel Department of Physical Chemistry, Douro Institute of Statistical Mechanics, Hungary Author
  • Martin Moravec Department of Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics, Warta Institute of Molecular Thermodynamics, Estonia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22698365

Keywords:

active matter, non-equilibrium thermodynamics, entropy production rate, self-propelled particles, motility-induced phase separation, stochastic thermodynamics, collective motion, fluctuation theorem

Abstract

Active matter systems, composed of self-propelled units that continuously consume energy to move, sit
fundamentally outside equilibrium statistical mechanics, yet a quantitative link between collective behaviors such as
clustering and the entropy production rate driving them has remained only partially established. We performed
Brownian dynamics simulations of self-propelled disks interacting via a short-range repulsive potential, computing
the stochastic entropy production rate from individual particle trajectories across 40 combinations of Péclet number
(2 to 150) and area fraction (0.20 to 0.70), with 2,000 particles per simulation and 60 independent replicates per
parameter combination. Entropy production rate per particle increased monotonically with Péclet number at fixed
density, from 0.34 k_B/tau at Pe = 2 to 18.7 k_B/tau at Pe = 150, but showed a pronounced non-monotonic
dependence on area fraction at fixed high Péclet number, peaking at an intermediate area fraction of 0.45 (11.2
k_B/tau at Pe = 100) before declining by 34% at area fraction 0.70 (7.4 k_B/tau), coinciding with the onset of
motility-induced phase separation identified independently from the local density distribution. The entropy
production rate peak at intermediate density correlated closely with the largest cluster size relative to system size,
which itself peaked at area fraction 0.45 (mean largest-cluster fraction 0.61 ± 0.04), suggesting cluster boundary
dynamics, rather than either the dilute gas phase or the dense jammed phase, are the dominant dissipative process
in this regime. A scaling analysis across the full Péclet-density parameter space found entropy production rate
scaled as Pe^1.82 ± 0.06 in the dilute regime (area fraction < 0.30) but as Pe^1.31 ± 0.09 in the phase-separated
regime (area fraction >= 0.55), a statistically significant difference (bootstrap 95% CI for exponent difference: 0.31
to 0.71) indicating that caging and cluster formation suppress the rate at which activity converts into dissipation.
These results establish a quantitative, trajectory-level link between a purely mechanical order parameter, cluster
size, and a purely thermodynamic quantity, entropy production rate, in a canonical active matter model, with
implications for estimating the energetic cost of self-organization in both synthetic active colloids and, more
speculatively, biological collective systems operating in comparable density and activity regimes.

References

Bennett CH (1982) The thermodynamics of computation-a review. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21(12):905-940. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02084158

Jarzynski C (1997) Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences. Physical Review Letters 78(14):2690-2693. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2690

Crooks GE (1999) Entropy production fluctuation theorem and the nonequilibrium work relation for free energy differences. Physical Review E 60(3):2721-2726. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.60.2721

Seifert U (2012) Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems and molecular machines. Reports on Progress in Physics 75(12):126001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/75/12/126001

Parrondo JMR, Horowitz JM, Sagawa T (2015) Thermodynamics of information. Nature Physics 11(2):131-139. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3230

Bekenstein JD (1973) Black holes and entropy. Physical Review D 7(8):2333-2346. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2333

Onsager L (1931) Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes. I. Physical Review 37(4):405-426. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.37.405

Tsallis C (1988) Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics. Journal of Statistical Physics 52(1-2):479-487. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01016429

Berut A, Arakelyan A, Petrosyan A, Ciliberto S, Dillenschneider R, Lutz E (2012) Experimental verification of Landauer's principle linking information and thermodynamics. Nature 483(7388):187-189. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10872

Lloyd S (2000) Ultimate physical limits to computation. Nature 406(6799):1047-1054. https://doi.org/10.1038/35023282

Esposito M, Van den Broeck C (2010) Three faces of the second law. I. Master equation formulation. Physical Review E 82(1):011143. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.82.011143

Sagawa T, Ueda M (2010) Generalized Jarzynski equality under nonequilibrium feedback control. Physical Review Letters 104(9):090602. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.090602

Toyabe S, Sagawa T, Ueda M, Muneyuki E, Sano M (2010) Experimental demonstration of information-to-energy conversion and validation of the generalized Jarzynski equality. Nature Physics 6(12):988-992. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1821

Verlinde E (2011) On the origin of gravity and the laws of Newton. Journal of High Energy Physics 2011(4):029. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2011)029

Vopson MM (2019) The mass-energy-information equivalence principle. AIP Advances 9(9):095206. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5123794

Szilard L (1929) Uber die Entropieverminderung in einem thermodynamischen System bei Eingriffen intelligenter Wesen. Zeitschrift fur Physik 53(11-12):840-856. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01341281

Prigogine I (1978) Time, structure, and fluctuations. Science 201(4358):777-785. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.201.4358.777

Hawking SW (1975) Particle creation by black holes. Communications in Mathematical Physics 43(3):199-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02345020

Wolpert DH (2019) The stochastic thermodynamics of computation. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 52(19):193001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ab0850

Still S, Sivak DA, Bell AJ, Crooks GE (2012) Thermodynamics of prediction. Physical Review Letters 109(12):120604. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.120604

Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27(3):379-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x

Jaynes ET (1957) Information theory and statistical mechanics. Physical Review 106(4):620-630. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.106.620

Landauer R (1961) Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process. IBM Journal of Research and Development 5(3):183-191. https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.53.0183

Bennett CH (1982) The thermodynamics of computation-a review. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21(12):905-940. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02084158

Jarzynski C (1997) Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences. Physical Review Letters 78(14):2690-2693. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2690

Crooks GE (1999) Entropy production fluctuation theorem and the nonequilibrium work relation for free energy differences. Physical Review E 60(3):2721-2726. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.60.2721

Downloads

Published

2023-06-10