Renewable Energy Policy Harmonization Across Regional Trade Blocs

Authors

  • Marius Virtanen Department of Renewable Energy and Climate Policy, Vistula Institute of Atmospheric Science, Poland Author
  • Sofia Marques Department of Renewable Energy and Climate Policy, Delta University Center for Climate Modeling, Netherlands Author
  • Owen Blomqvist Department of Environmental Science and Sustainability, Shannon University Centre for Ecology and Biodiversity, Ireland Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22816824

Keywords:

renewable energy policy, regional trade blocs, policy harmonization, cross-border electricity trade, renewable portfolio standards, European Union, ASEAN, Mercosur, African Continental Free Trade Area

Abstract

Regional trade blocs increasingly frame renewable energy cooperation as a trade-policy objective, yet whether
harmonized renewable standards translate into measurably greater cross-border electricity trade remains poorly
quantified outside the European context. We compared renewable energy policy frameworks across four regional
trade blocs, the European Union, ASEAN, Mercosur, and the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA),
constructing a policy harmonization index from 2010-2023 legal texts spanning renewable portfolio targets,
grid-code and interconnection standards, guarantee-of-origin certificate mutual recognition, and cross-border tariff
treatment of renewable electricity, and matched this index against bloc-level cross-border electricity trade volumes
and renewable capacity growth from IEA and bloc statistical agencies. The EU scored highest on the harmonization
index (0.81 of 1.0), driven by binding target transposition and mutually recognized guarantees of origin, and
recorded the largest cross-border renewable electricity trade share (14.2% of renewable generation). ASEAN
scored 0.34, reflecting voluntary targets and limited interconnection standardization despite the operating ASEAN
Power Grid pilot interconnections. AfCFTA and Mercosur scored 0.21 and 0.28 respectively, constrained by
non-binding instruments and heterogeneous grid codes. Panel regression across 2010-2023 bloc-years found each
0.1-point increase in the harmonization index associated with a 2.6 percentage-point increase in cross-border
renewable trade share (95% CI 1.4-3.8), controlling for interconnector capacity and GDP growth.
Guarantee-of-origin mutual recognition was the single instrument most strongly associated with trade growth. These
findings indicate that harmonization of certification and grid-interconnection instruments, rather than target-level
ambition alone, is the more tractable near-term lever for blocs seeking to expand cross-border renewable electricity
trade, with direct relevance for ongoing AfCFTA energy protocol and ASEAN grid interconnection negotiations.

References

Meckling J, Sterner T, Wagner G (2017) Policy sequencing toward decarbonization. Nature Energy 2:918-922. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0025-8

Jenner S, Groba F, Indvik J (2013) Assessing the strength and effectiveness of renewable electricity feed-in tariffs in European Union countries. Energy Policy 52:385-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.046

Ringel M (2006) Fostering the use of renewable energies in the European Union: the race between feed-in tariffs and green certificates. Renewable Energy 31(1):1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2005.03.015

Lauber V (2004) REFIT and RPS: options for a harmonised Community framework. Energy Policy 32(12):1405-1414. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00108-9

Fouquet D, Johansson TB (2008) European renewable energy policy at crossroads: Focus on electricity support mechanisms. Energy Policy 36(11):4079-4092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.023

Klessmann C, Nabe C, Burges K (2008) Pros and cons of exposing renewables to electricity market risks: A comparison of the market integration approaches in Germany, Spain, and the UK. Energy Policy 36(10):3646-3661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.022

Jacobsson S, Lauber V (2006) The politics and policy of energy system transformation: explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy 34(3):256-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.029

Schaffer LM, Bernauer T (2014) Explaining government choices for promoting renewable energy. Energy Policy 68:15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.064

Schmidt TS, Sewerin S (2017) Technology as a driver of climate and energy politics. Nature Energy 2:17084. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.84

Meckling J, Kelsey N, Biber E, Zysman J (2015) Winning coalitions for climate policy. Science 349(6253):1170-1171. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab1336

Pollitt MG (2019) The European Single Market in electricity: An economic assessment. Review of Industrial Organization 55(1):63-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-019-09682-w

Glachant JM, Ruester S (2014) The EU internal electricity market: Done forever? Utilities Policy 31:221-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2014.03.006

Meeus L, Purchala K, Belmans R (2005) Development of the internal electricity market in Europe. The Electricity Journal 18(6):25-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2005.06.010

Jägemann C, Fürsch M, Hagspiel S, Nagl S (2013) Decarbonizing Europe's power sector by 2050: Analyzing the economic implications of alternative decarbonization pathways. Energy Economics 40:622-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.08.019

Oseni MO, Pollitt MG (2016) The promotion of regional integration of electricity markets: Lessons for developing countries. Energy Policy 88:531-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.09.007

Trotter PA, McManus MC, Maconachie R (2017) Electricity planning and implementation in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 74:1189-1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.001

Sokona Y, Mulugetta Y, Gujba H (2012) Widening energy access in Africa: Towards energy transition. Energy Policy 47:3-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.040

Rosnes O, Vennemo H (2012) The cost of providing electricity to Africa. Energy Economics 34(5):1318-1328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.06.008

Battaglini A, Lilliestam J, Haas A, Patt A (2009) Development of SuperSmart Grids for a more efficient utilisation of electricity from renewable sources. Journal of Cleaner Production 17(10):911-918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.02.006

Chatzivasileiadis S, Ernst D, Andersson G (2013) The Global Grid. Renewable Energy 57:372-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.01.032

Lilliestam J, Ellenbeck S (2011) Energy security and renewable electricity trade: Will Desertec make Europe vulnerable to the "energy weapon"? Energy Policy 39(6):3380-3391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.035

Sovacool BK (2016) How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science 13:202-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.020

Verbruggen A, Fischedick M, Moomaw W, Weir T, Nadai A, Nilsson LJ, Nyboer J, Sathaye J (2010) Renewable energy costs, potentials, barriers: Conceptual issues. Energy Policy 38(2):850-861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.036

Dobbins A, Fuso Nerini F, Deane P, Pye S (2019) Strengthening the EU response to energy poverty. Nature Energy 4:2-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0316-8

Alova G (2020) A global analysis of the progress and failure of electric utilities to adapt their portfolios of power-generation assets to the energy transition. Nature Energy 5:920-927. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00686-5

Brutschin E, Fleig A (2016) Innovation in the energy sector: The role of fossil fuels and developing economies. Energy Policy 97:27-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.06.037

Colgan JD, Green JF, Hale TN (2021) Asset revaluation and the existential politics of climate change. International Organization 75(2):586-610. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000296

Downloads

Published

2026-06-06