Phenological Shifts in Temperate Forest Species Under Warming Climate Conditions

Authors

  • Nikos Benitez Department of Renewable Energy and Climate Policy, Nordic Institute of Climate and Ecology, Finland Author
  • Claire Fischer Department of Atmospheric Science and Meteorology, Baltic Institute of Renewable Energy, Sweden Author
  • Johanna Peeters Division of Ecology and Biodiversity, Loire University Center for Climate Data Analysis, France Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22801581

Keywords:

plant phenology, budburst, spring leaf-out, autumn senescence, climate warming, temperate forest, long-term phenological network, in-situ warming experiment, growing season length, chilling requirement

Abstract

Warming-driven shifts in the timing of budburst, flowering and autumn senescence are among the most widely
documented biological responses to climate change, yet the degree to which species differ in their sensitivity, and
whether passive observational trends agree with the response measured under experimental warming, remains
incompletely resolved for temperate forest communities. We combined 42 years (1981-2022) of ground-observed
phenological records from 45 long-term monitoring sites spanning a 9 degree latitudinal and 1450 m elevational
gradient across Finland, Sweden and France with a six-year (2017-2022) in-situ canopy warming experiment
(infrared heating, +2.2 degrees Celsius above ambient) replicated at two of these sites, covering six dominant
woody species: European beech (Fagus sylvatica), pedunculate oak (Quercus robur), silver birch (Betula pendula),
sycamore maple (Acer pseudoplatanus), common ash (Fraxinus excelsior) and the understory shrub hazel (Corylus
avellana). Across the monitoring network, mean spring budburst advanced by 3.1 days per decade (network-wide
linear mixed-model estimate, 95% confidence interval 2.4-3.8), with species-specific advances ranging from 1.6
days per decade in Quercus robur to 4.9 days per decade in Corylus avellana, while autumn leaf colouring and
abscission were delayed by a mean of 1.8 days per decade, yielding a net growing-season extension averaging 4.9
days per decade. The warming experiment produced budburst advances consistent in direction but systematically
smaller in magnitude than those implied by the observational network's temperature sensitivity for four of six
species, with the largest observational-experimental divergence in Fagus sylvatica. Chilling fulfilment, estimated
from winter temperature records at each site, explained a significant share of interannual variation in spring forcing
requirement in Fagus sylvatica and Quercus robur but not in the three earlier-flushing species, indicating that
photoperiod and forcing temperature dominate their spring response. These results demonstrate genuine,
ecologically meaningful interspecific variation in phenological sensitivity within a single regional forest community
and indicate that short-term experimental warming may under-represent the long-term realised sensitivity of species
whose spring phenology is jointly constrained by winter chilling and spring forcing.

References

Menzel A, Sparks TH, Estrella N, Koch E, Aasa A, Ahas R, Alm-Kubler K, Bissolli P, Braslavska O, Briede A, Chmielewski FM, Crepinsek Z, Curnel Y, Dahl A, Defila C, Donnelly A, Filella Y, Jatczak K, Mage F, Mestre A, Nordli O, Penuelas J, Pirinen P, Remisova V, Scheifinger H, Striz M, Susnik A, Van Vliet AJH, Wielgolaski FE, Zach S, Zust A (2006) European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Global Change Biology 12(10):1969-1976. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01193.x

Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37-42. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01286

Root TL, Price JT, Hall KR, Schneider SH, Rosenzweig C, Pounds JA (2003) Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421:57-60. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01333

Cleland EE, Chuine I, Menzel A, Mooney HA, Schwartz MD (2007) Shifting plant phenology in response to global change. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22(7):357-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.04.003

Fu YH, Zhao H, Piao S, Peaucelle M, Peng S, Zhou G, Ciais P, Huang M, Menzel A, Uelas J, Song Y, Vitasse Y, Zeng Z, Janssens IA (2015) Declining global warming effects on the phenology of spring leaf unfolding. Nature 526:104-107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15402

Vitasse Y, Delzon S, Dufrene E, Pontailler JY, Louvet JM, Kremer A, Michalet R (2009) Leaf phenology sensitivity to temperature in European trees: do within-species populations exhibit similar responses? Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 149(5):735-744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.10.019

Piao S, Liu Q, Chen A, Janssens IA, Fu Y, Dai J, Liu L, Lian X, Shen M, Zhu X (2019) Plant phenology and global climate change: current progresses and challenges. Global Change Biology 25(6):1922-1940. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14619

Richardson AD, Keenan TF, Migliavacca M, Ryu Y, Sonnentag O, Toomey M (2013) Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 169:156-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.012

Polgar CA, Primack RB (2011) Leaf-out phenology of temperate woody plants: from trees to ecosystems. New Phytologist 191(4):926-941. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03803.x

Chuine I, Beaubien EG (2001) Phenology is a major determinant of tree species range. Ecology Letters 4(5):500-510. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00261.x

Korner C, Basler D (2010) Phenology under global warming. Science 327(5972):1461-1462. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1186473

Fitter AH, Fitter RSR (2002) Rapid changes in flowering time in British plants. Science 296(5573):1689-1691. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1071617

Sherry RA, Zhou X, Gu S, Arnone JA III, Schimel DS, Verburg PS, Wallace LL, Luo Y (2007) Divergence of reproductive phenology under climate warming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(1):198-202. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605642104

Wolkovich EM, Cook BI, Allen JM, Crimmins TM, Betancourt JL, Travers SE, Pau S, Regetz J, Davies TJ, Kraft NJB, Ault TR, Bolmgren K, Mazer SJ, McCabe GJ, McGill BJ, Parmesan C, Salamin N, Schwartz MD, Cleland EE (2012) Warming experiments underpredict plant phenological responses to climate change. Nature 485:494-497. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11014

Zohner CM, Renner SS (2014) Common garden comparison of the leaf-out phenology of woody species from different native climates, combined with herbarium records, forecasts long-term change. Ecology Letters 17(8):1016-1025. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12308

Vitasse Y, Signarbieux C, Fu YH (2018) Global warming leads to more uniform spring phenology across elevations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(5):1004-1008. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717342115

Penuelas J, Filella I (2001) Responses to a warming world. Science 294(5543):793-795. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1066860

Keenan TF, Gray J, Friedl MA, Toomey M, Bohrer G, Hollinger DY, Munger JW, O'Keefe J, Schmid HP, Wing IS, Yang B, Richardson AD (2014) Net carbon uptake has increased through warming-induced changes in temperate forest phenology. Nature Climate Change 4:598-604. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2253

Menzel A, Fabian P (1999) Growing season extended in Europe. Nature 397:659. https://doi.org/10.1038/17709

Jeong SJ, Ho CH, Gim HJ, Brown ME (2011) Phenology shifts at start vs. end of growing season in temperate vegetation over the Northern Hemisphere for the period 1982-2008. Global Change Biology 17(7):2385-2399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02397.x

Basler D, Korner C (2012) Photoperiod sensitivity of bud burst in 14 temperate forest tree species. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 165:73-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.06.001

Laube J, Sparks TH, Estrella N, Hofler J, Ankerst DP, Menzel A (2014) Chilling outweighs photoperiod in preventing precocious spring development. Global Change Biology 20(1):170-182. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12360

Estiarte M, Penuelas J (2015) Alteration of the phenology of leaf senescence and fall in winter deciduous species by climate change: effects on nutrient proficiency. Global Change Biology 21(3):1005-1017. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12804

Liu Q, Fu YH, Zhu Z, Liu Y, Liu Z, Huang M, Janssens IA, Piao S (2016) Delayed autumn phenology in the Northern Hemisphere is related to change in both climate and spring phenology. Global Change Biology 22(11):3702-3711. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13311

Gallinat AS, Primack RB, Wagner DL (2015) Autumn, the neglected season in climate change research. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 30(3):169-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.01.004

Fu YH, Piao S, Vitasse Y, Zhao H, De Boeck HJ, Liu Q, Yang H, Weber U, Hanninen H, Janssens IA (2015) Increased heat requirement for leaf flushing in temperate woody species over 1980-2012: effects of chilling, precipitation and insolation. Global Change Biology 21(7):2687-2697. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12863

Downloads

Published

2024-06-02