REAL TIME MISSILE DEFENCE SYSTEM WITH DYNAMIC VISUALIZATION
Keywords:
6DOF, VirtualReality, MissileDynamics, Simulation, Training, ImmersiveTechnologyAbstract
Objectives: To identify the prevalence of common inhalant allergens among patients.Material and Method: This is a cross sectional retrospective observational descriptive study design including 110 patients,who were referred to Asthma and Allergy clinic of children hospital in King Saud Medical City, Riyadh (KSMC) between June2016 and December 2018 with primary diagnosis air way diseases, eczema and food allergy.Data Collection and Analysis: Data was collected through questionnaire, checklist and data Based of skin prick test results.The Skin prick test (SPT) procedure was used for all patients as diagnostic of airway allergy and therapeutic as routine inter-vention tools. The SPT was carried out on the forearm. Any number of allergens can be tested, as few as 3 or 4 or up to about 18
allergens. Clean arm with soap and water or alcohol. The forearm is coded with a skin marker pen corresponding to the num-
ber of allergens being tested. A single drop of each allergen extract was applied, two centimeters apart. A small prick through
the drop is made to the skin using Stallerpoint plastic needles (Stallergenes, France). A wheal reaction after 15 minutes ≥ 3
mm in diameter more than negative control was regarded as a positive sensitization to that allergen. Antihistamines were dis-
continued before the SPT was conducted. Glycerinated solutions of histamine phosphate (10 mg/mL) and saline were used as
positive and negative controls, respectively. There are some cases exclude from study those of unclear diagnosis, non-reactive
skin either used antihistamine or have hyper reactive skin.
References
Miedziński iD, iKaczmarek iK, iRodo iP, iSahbon iN, iSochacki iM, iet ial. i(2023) i Missile iAerodynamics iModel iIdentification iUsing iFlight iData. iIEEE iAeroi spaceiConf,ip.i1-12.
Dang iST, iNguyen iHA, iNguyen iHD, iMinh iKieu iTT i(2023) iMathematical i framework ifor isimulating ian iair-to- iair imissile ioperation ion ifighter iairi craft.iIntiJiComputiMethodsiExpiMeas.
Purnawan iH, iTahiyatul iA, iDieky iA, iSubchan i(2018) iMathematical iModeli ing iand iSimulation iof iMissile iFiring iImpact iForce ion iWarship. i2018 iInt i SeminiResiInfiTechnoliIntelligentiSyst,ipp.i566-570.
Silveira iG, iCarrara iV i(2015) iA iSix iDegrees-of-Freedom iFlight iDynamics i Simulation iTool iof iLaunch iVehicles. iJ iAerosp iTechnol iManage i7(2): i231- i 239.
BuzantowicziWi(2016)iMatlabiScriptifori3DiVisualizationiofiMissileiand i Air iTargetiTrajectories.iIntiJiComputiInfiTechnoli5(5).
Cross iJ, iHodgson iCB, iRyley iT, iMavin iTJ, iPotter iLE, iet ial. i(2023) iUsing iExi tended iReality iin iFlight iSimulators: iA iLiterature iReview. iIEEE iTrans iVis i ComputiGraphicsi29(9):i3961-3975.
Awad iAE, iWang iH i(2014) iEvaluation iand ienhancing imissile iperformance i via ireal itime iflight isimulation imodel. iProc i33rd iChinese iControl iConf, ipp. i 6324-6329.
Zhang iX, iLei iHM, iLi iJ, iZhang iDY i(2014) iBallistic imissile itrajectory ipredici tion iand ithe isolution ialgorithms ifor iimpact ipoint iprediction. iProc i2014 i IEEEiChineseiGuidanceiNaviControliConf,ipp.i879-883.
Hamtil iI, iFarlík iJ, iKrátký iM i(2015) iThe iair idefence imissile isystem ieffective i coverage ideter- imination iusing icomputer isimulation. iInt iConf iMilitary i Technologiesi(ICMT),ip.i1-5.
Sahbon iN, iWelcer iM i(2024) iComparison iof iTwo iAerodynamic iModels ifor i ProjectileiTrajectoryiSimulation.iAerospacei11(3):i189.
SrouriK,iAbdulkerimiSi(2023)iSimulationiofiai6DOFiNonlineariMissile,ipp. 415-423.
Xian iY, iRen iLL, iXu iYJ, iLi iSP, iWu iW, iet ial. i(2023) iImpact ipoint iprediction i guidance iof iballistic imissile iin ihigh imaneuver ipenetration icondition. iDei fenceiTechnoli26:i213-230.
Abu iEl-Wafa iA, iAbozied iHassan iAbozied iM, iHendy iH, iElhalwagy iYZ i(2022) i Advanced iTop-Attack iTrajectory iGuidance iLaw iwith iImpact iAngle iConi straints.iJiEngiSciiMilitaryiTechnol.
Na iH, iLee iJI i(2020) iOptimal iArrangement iof iMissile iDefense iSystems iConi sideringiKilliProbability.iIEEEiTransiAerospiElectroniSysti56(2):i972-983.
DangiS,iWangiQI,iWangiLIi(2017)iResearchioniSimulationiSystemiofiMis- i sile iandiArrowsiBasedioniUnity3D.
JoiE,iKimiS,iShiniB,iLeeiDHi(2017)i6-DOFisimulationianditheivulnerable areaiofitheiAir-to-AirimissileitoidevelopianiEnd-gameisimulator.
Lewandowski i R i (2015) i Six-Degree-of-Freedom i Digital i Simulations i for MissileiGuidanceiandiControl.
HarliniWJ,iCicciiDAi(2007)iBallisticimissileitrajectoryipredictioniusingia stateitransitionimatrix.iAppliMathiComputi188(2):i1832-1847.
Fogarty iLE, iHowe iRM i(1968) iComputer imechanization iof isix-degree iof i freedomiflightiequations.iSIMULATIONi11(4):i187-193.
GiParkeri(2018)iAdvancediTechniquesiiniMissileiSimulation.iJournaliof DefenseiTechnologyi12(4):i455-467.
Johnson iR i(2021) iVirtual iReality ifor iEnhanced iMissile iSimulation iTraini ing.iDefenseiSimulationiJournali15(2):i89-104.
Lee iM, iKim iH i(2019) iOptimization iof iMissile iTrajectory iUsing iAI iAlgoi rithms.iInternationaliJournaliofiAerospaceiSciencesi9(3):i177-190.
Wilson iT i(2020) iIntegration iof iMachine iLearning iin iMissile iGuidance i Systems. iIEEE iTransactions ion iAerospace iand iElectronic iSystems i56(6): i 4891-4902.
ClarkiD,iThompsoniJi(2022)iImpactiofiEnvironmentaliFactorsioniMissile Performance.iJournaliofiMissileiSystemsiEngineeringi30(1):i12-27.
